| Notices |
Welcome to our forums! This online gardening community is different, political, and organic. I decided to start these forums so gardeners would have a free place to discuss heirloom gardening, gene-altered food, seed saving, natural politics and products. We are dedicated to saving our food and horticultural heritage, and hope you enjoy this forum for the free-thinking gardener! Wishing you great gardening, Jere Gettle |
![]() |
IDigMyGarden Forums > The Politics of Food | |
Huge hog house disaster
|
||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#11 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, down on the Peninsula
USDA Zone: 9b
Posts: 733
|
Quote:
I'll try to dig up the reference, but there was an article in the news a few years back that put a 3-5 year amortization period on a large-scale hog farm methane digester. They heated their barns in the winter with the waste heat from generating energy from the methane operation, so it accelerated the payback period.
__________________
http://www.grow-it-organically.com |
|
|
#12 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
USDA Zone: 5a
Posts: 115
|
Quote:
I can remember when Tyson came to our area and put an end to the local hog business. They make it sound so good, but here is what the local farmers discovered in the end: all the money saved on being 'industrial' is eaten up by ever increasing costs: 'technology investments,' freight, immunizations, and corporate pockets. In the end the farmer makes less money, but they are tied into a contract they can't escape without loosing their farm. Before the farmer gets close to paying off their loans, they are required to invest in xyz (which doubles their loan, and keeps them paying interest rather than principal). After a few years, farmers got wise but by then it is too late... the local infrastructure has been destroyed (and there is another sucker 2 counties down waiting for the chance to become a corporate pawn). |
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
USDA Zone: No zone info
Posts: 572
|
Not really. 300 on every 1/4 section is the same 3000 on every 2.5 sections.
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
USDA Zone: No zone info
Posts: 572
|
Quote:
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northwest Arkansas
USDA Zone: 6b
Posts: 2,421
|
Aw phooey, we eat too much meat anyway.
__________________
"It is far better to debate a question before settling it than to settle a question before debating it. While the process does not always guarantee an inerrant conclusion, it often protects against vacuous leaps from ignorance to ignorance" Ravi Zacharias |
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Ohio
USDA Zone: 5b
Posts: 281
|
It takes a whole lot more acreage to take the manure from 3000 pigs than 300.
That's one of the problems, farmers not increasing their acreage but increasing the pigs. A hog house goes through 2.5 batches per year, so that would be manure from 7500 pigs from one house. |
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
USDA Zone: No zone info
Posts: 572
|
Even a family farmer 20 years ago would farrrow to finish 2000+.
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Eastern Iowa
USDA Zone: 4b
Posts: 5,017
|
Joel Salatin raises hogs in his grass farm operation. He lets then roam his woods to browse. They mostly live in fresh air.
I buy "fresh air pork" at my farmer's market and through the buying club. It is not as cheap to use these methods, or as profitable for the grower, but the resulting pork is good. I enjoy it in small quantities. My concern is that it is impossible to really do the "math" to figure which is the most cost effective way to produce pork. First, you have to factor in environmental cost of inevitable manure spills. We regularly have fish kills in creeks and streams because of manure accidents. Then, you have to figure out if there is a health impacting difference between pork raised by the two methods. Last but not least, you have to figure out the cost of tax dollars used to support hog and feed prices. It really is part of the cost, but it is separated from the cost at the cash register.
__________________
Ovenbird I love gardeners. You are great people. http://greatbackyardexperiment.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
#19 |
|
Senior Member
|
How many here have raised pigs well I have and it's not some fun fairy tale some think it is. While I don't like the hog barns there is a reason many hogs are done that way mainly due to cost. Pastured raised pork is simply going to be higher than confined pork. With the cost of grain going price of small producer raised pork will continue to go up and also most can't let hogs run loose in the woods, they will destroy a forest.
__________________
He who cultivates his land will have plenty of food, but from idle pursuits a man has his fill of poverty Proverbs 28:19 |
|
|
#20 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
USDA Zone: 7a
Posts: 12,847
|
We buy pork from a local farmer who raises a few hogs to sell and we pay more for it than mass produced meat, but measuring everything in terms of money, i.e., "can I get it cheaper", isn't the only consideration for me.
There are plenty of reasons not to buy mass produced, Big Ag meat. Modern ag meat raising practices aren't friendly to the environment, they use massive amounts of energy and aren't sustainable. The animals are treated horribly.... We buy from small farmers who treat their animals well; plenty of access to fresh air, sunshine, food, water... no overcrowding. To me, that's the way animals should be raised. We always raised a hog or two; they're great leftover recyclers, and up until the day they were slaughtered they were treated well. As Granny said, 'a hog is a thrifty animal; you can eat everything but the squeal....'
__________________
~Power to the Peaceful~ ~The Earth would be better off if the Meek inherited it sooner rather than later.~ http://www.echonet.org/ |
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:37 AM.









